AWS prescriptive-guidance documentation change
Summary
Added asterisks (****) after colons in multiple risk management questions and section headers for formatting emphasis
Security assessment
Changes are purely cosmetic formatting adjustments (adding asterisks) without modifying security content. No vulnerabilities, mitigations, or security features are added/altered.
Diff
diff --git a/prescriptive-guidance/latest/failure-mode-effects-analysis/phase-2.md b/prescriptive-guidance/latest/failure-mode-effects-analysis/phase-2.md index f2b74d7b5..6e1374e3e 100644 --- a//prescriptive-guidance/latest/failure-mode-effects-analysis/phase-2.md +++ b//prescriptive-guidance/latest/failure-mode-effects-analysis/phase-2.md @@ -159 +159 @@ Add the following risk-focused questions to your daily standup: - * **Risk status update** : "Any updates on risk mitigation tasks?" + * **Risk status update** :**** "Any updates on risk mitigation tasks?" @@ -161 +161 @@ Add the following risk-focused questions to your daily standup: - * **New risk identification** : "Did you discover any new risks while working?" + * **New risk identification** :**** "Did you discover any new risks while working?" @@ -163 +163 @@ Add the following risk-focused questions to your daily standup: - * **Mitigation blockers** : "Are there any blockers preventing risk mitigation completion?" + * **Mitigation blockers** :**** "Are there any blockers preventing risk mitigation completion?" @@ -183 +183 @@ Add 15 minutes to your sprint review for risk mitigation validation: - * **Mitigation demonstration** : Demo implemented risk mitigations, show monitoring and alerting configurations, and validate mitigation effectiveness through testing. + * **Mitigation demonstration** :**** Demo implemented risk mitigations, show monitoring and alerting configurations, and validate mitigation effectiveness through testing. @@ -185 +185 @@ Add 15 minutes to your sprint review for risk mitigation validation: - * **Risk status summary** : Review all risks identified during the sprint, confirm mitigation completion status, and document any residual or newly discovered risks. + * **Risk status summary** :**** Review all risks identified during the sprint, confirm mitigation completion status, and document any residual or newly discovered risks. @@ -187 +187 @@ Add 15 minutes to your sprint review for risk mitigation validation: - * **Stakeholder risk communication** : Communicate risk management activities to stakeholders, highlight proactive risk prevention measures, and discuss any risks requiring stakeholder attention. + * **Stakeholder risk communication** :**** Communicate risk management activities to stakeholders, highlight proactive risk prevention measures, and discuss any risks requiring stakeholder attention. @@ -196 +196 @@ Add the following questions to your retrospective to continuously improve the FM - * **Risk assessment effectiveness** : How accurate were our risk predictions? Did we miss any significant risks that materialized? Were our RPN calculations realistic? + * **Risk assessment effectiveness** :**** How accurate were our risk predictions? Did we miss any significant risks that materialized? Were our RPN calculations realistic? @@ -198 +198 @@ Add the following questions to your retrospective to continuously improve the FM - * **Process integration** : How well did FMEA integrate with our existing processes? What slowed down our risk assessment activities? How can we make risk analysis more efficient? + * **Process integration** :**** How well did FMEA integrate with our existing processes? What slowed down our risk assessment activities? How can we make risk analysis more efficient? @@ -200 +200 @@ Add the following questions to your retrospective to continuously improve the FM - * **Mitigation success** : Were our risk mitigations effective? What mitigation strategies worked best? How can we improve our mitigation planning? + * **Mitigation success** :**** Were our risk mitigations effective? What mitigation strategies worked best? How can we improve our mitigation planning?