AWS rekognition documentation change
Summary
Removed a JSON IAM policy example granting permissions for Kinesis Video Streams, SNS, and S3 operations.
Security assessment
The change removes a policy example but does not explicitly address a security vulnerability or weakness. It appears to be routine documentation cleanup.
Diff
diff --git a/rekognition/latest/dg/streaming-labels-setting-up.md b/rekognition/latest/dg/streaming-labels-setting-up.md index 1faa693f3..5993fdbfb 100644 --- a//rekognition/latest/dg/streaming-labels-setting-up.md +++ b//rekognition/latest/dg/streaming-labels-setting-up.md @@ -50,45 +49,0 @@ You can create a permissions policy that allows Amazon Rekognition Video access -JSON - - -**** - - - { - "Version": "2012-10-17", - "Statement": [ - { - "Sid": "KinesisVideoPermissions", - "Effect": "Allow", - "Action": [ - "kinesisvideo:GetDataEndpoint", - "kinesisvideo:GetMedia" - ], - "Resource": [ - "arn:${Partition}:kinesisvideo:${us-east-1}:${123456789012}:stream/${StreamName}/${CreationTime}" - ] - }, - { - "Sid": "SNSPermissions", - "Effect": "Allow", - "Action": [ - "sns:Publish" - ], - "Resource": [ - "arn:${Partition}:sns:${us-east-1}:${123456789012}:${TopicName}" - ] - }, - { - "Sid": "S3Permissions", - "Effect": "Allow", - "Action": [ - "s3:PutObject" - ], - "Resource": [ - "arn:${Partition}:s3:::${BucketName}" - ] - } - ] - } - - -