AWS cli documentation change
Summary
Updated navigation links, CLI version references, and expanded descriptions of automated reasoning evaluation results related to policy validation
Security assessment
Changes enhance documentation about policy rule validation through automated reasoning evaluation, which relates to security feature documentation. However, there's no evidence of addressing a specific vulnerability or security incident.
Diff
diff --git a/cli/latest/reference/bedrock-runtime/converse.md b/cli/latest/reference/bedrock-runtime/converse.md index 1414ea2b2..89d94c489 100644 --- a//cli/latest/reference/bedrock-runtime/converse.md +++ b//cli/latest/reference/bedrock-runtime/converse.md @@ -13 +13 @@ - * [next](get-async-invoke.html "get-async-invoke") | + * [next](count-tokens.html "count-tokens") | @@ -15 +15 @@ - * [AWS CLI 2.28.12 Command Reference](../../index.html) » + * [AWS CLI 2.28.15 Command Reference](../../index.html) » @@ -23 +23 @@ - * [get-async-invoke →](get-async-invoke.html "next chapter \(use the right arrow\)") + * [count-tokens →](count-tokens.html "next chapter \(use the right arrow\)") @@ -2199 +2199 @@ trace -> (structure) ->>>>>>>> Indicates that the claims are definitively true and logically implied by the premises, with no possible alternative interpretations. +>>>>>>>> Contains the result when the automated reasoning evaluation determines that the claims in the input are logically valid and definitively true based on the provided premises and policy rules. @@ -2343 +2343 @@ trace -> (structure) ->>>>>>>> Indicates that the claims are logically false and contradictory to the established rules or premises. +>>>>>>>> Contains the result when the automated reasoning evaluation determines that the claims in the input are logically invalid and contradict the established premises or policy rules. @@ -2467 +2467 @@ trace -> (structure) ->>>>>>>> Indicates that the claims could be either true or false depending on additional assumptions not provided in the input. +>>>>>>>> Contains the result when the automated reasoning evaluation determines that the claims in the input could be either true or false depending on additional assumptions not provided in the input context. @@ -2615 +2615 @@ trace -> (structure) ->>>>>>>> Indicates that no valid claims can be made due to logical contradictions in the premises or rules. +>>>>>>>> Contains the result when the automated reasoning evaluation determines that no valid logical conclusions can be drawn due to contradictions in the premises or policy rules themselves. @@ -2739 +2739 @@ trace -> (structure) ->>>>>>>> Indicates that the input has multiple valid logical interpretations, requiring additional context or clarification. +>>>>>>>> Contains the result when the automated reasoning evaluation detects that the input has multiple valid logical interpretations, requiring additional context or clarification to proceed with validation. @@ -2843 +2843 @@ trace -> (structure) ->>>>>>>> Indicates that the input exceeds the processing capacity due to the volume or complexity of the logical information. +>>>>>>>> Contains the result when the automated reasoning evaluation cannot process the input due to its complexity or volume exceeding the system’s processing capacity for logical analysis. @@ -2847 +2847 @@ trace -> (structure) ->>>>>>>> Indicates that no relevant logical information could be extracted from the input for validation. +>>>>>>>> Contains the result when the automated reasoning evaluation cannot extract any relevant logical information from the input that can be validated against the policy rules. @@ -3151 +3151 @@ trace -> (structure) ->>>>>>>>> Indicates that the claims are definitively true and logically implied by the premises, with no possible alternative interpretations. +>>>>>>>>> Contains the result when the automated reasoning evaluation determines that the claims in the input are logically valid and definitively true based on the provided premises and policy rules. @@ -3295 +3295 @@ trace -> (structure) ->>>>>>>>> Indicates that the claims are logically false and contradictory to the established rules or premises. +>>>>>>>>> Contains the result when the automated reasoning evaluation determines that the claims in the input are logically invalid and contradict the established premises or policy rules. @@ -3419 +3419 @@ trace -> (structure) ->>>>>>>>> Indicates that the claims could be either true or false depending on additional assumptions not provided in the input. +>>>>>>>>> Contains the result when the automated reasoning evaluation determines that the claims in the input could be either true or false depending on additional assumptions not provided in the input context. @@ -3567 +3567 @@ trace -> (structure) ->>>>>>>>> Indicates that no valid claims can be made due to logical contradictions in the premises or rules. +>>>>>>>>> Contains the result when the automated reasoning evaluation determines that no valid logical conclusions can be drawn due to contradictions in the premises or policy rules themselves. @@ -3691 +3691 @@ trace -> (structure) ->>>>>>>>> Indicates that the input has multiple valid logical interpretations, requiring additional context or clarification. +>>>>>>>>> Contains the result when the automated reasoning evaluation detects that the input has multiple valid logical interpretations, requiring additional context or clarification to proceed with validation. @@ -3795 +3795 @@ trace -> (structure) ->>>>>>>>> Indicates that the input exceeds the processing capacity due to the volume or complexity of the logical information. +>>>>>>>>> Contains the result when the automated reasoning evaluation cannot process the input due to its complexity or volume exceeding the system’s processing capacity for logical analysis. @@ -3799 +3799 @@ trace -> (structure) ->>>>>>>>> Indicates that no relevant logical information could be extracted from the input for validation. +>>>>>>>>> Contains the result when the automated reasoning evaluation cannot extract any relevant logical information from the input that can be validated against the policy rules. @@ -3898 +3898 @@ performanceConfig -> (structure) - * [get-async-invoke →](get-async-invoke.html "next chapter \(use the right arrow\)") + * [count-tokens →](count-tokens.html "next chapter \(use the right arrow\)") @@ -3905 +3905 @@ performanceConfig -> (structure) - * [next](get-async-invoke.html "get-async-invoke") | + * [next](count-tokens.html "count-tokens") | @@ -3907 +3907 @@ performanceConfig -> (structure) - * [AWS CLI 2.28.12 Command Reference](../../index.html) » + * [AWS CLI 2.28.15 Command Reference](../../index.html) »